Mayberry
People v. Mayberry
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 6/4/
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
THE PEOPLE,
F085869
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. F18904486) v.
DARRYN MAYBERRY, OPINION
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Houry A. Sanderson, Judge. William D. Farber, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Michael P. Farrell, Assistant Attorney General, Louis M. Vasquez, Kari Mueller, Lewis A. Martinez, and Joseph M. Penney, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. -ooOoo- The trial court found defendant Darryn Mayberry ineligible for resentencing under Penal Code1 section 1172.75. It reasoned that the original sentence was “illegal” due to the section 667.5, former subdivision (b) enhancements2 being imposed but stayed, the sentence was not appealed, and the court therefore did not have the “ability” to “go back in time and do anything about those illegal sentences.” Defendant appealed from that ruling. We conclude…