Waud

Waud v. Dawson-Dixon CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 5, 2024G063304California7,640 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gooding, J.

Filed 6/5/24 Waud v. Dawson-Dixon CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

ERNEST P. WAUD III et al.,

Plaintiffs and Respondents G063304

v. (Super. Ct. No. CVPS2100614)

MARILYN J. DAWSON-DIXON, OPINION

Defendant and Appellant,

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County, Godofredo Magno, Judge. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. Point Law Group and Troy M. Mueller for Defendant and Appellant. Sauer & Wagner, Robert S. Chapman and Gregory P. Barchie for Plaintiffs and Respondents. Respondents Ernest P. Waud III and Chase Steer are neighbors and friends who share an interest in show horses. In 2019, Steer…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.