Seymour-Smith
United States v. Seymour-Smith
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 5 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-1291 D.C. No. 2:18-cr-00064-TOR-1 Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MEMORANDUM*
KEENAN TYREL SEYMOUR-SMITH,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Thomas O. Rice, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 29, 2024**
Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.
Keenan Tyrel Seymour-Smith appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the 12-month sentence imposed upon the revocation of his supervised
release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Seymour-Smith contends that the district court failed to explain the sentence
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). adequately and did not address his mitigating arguments. We…