Seymour-Smith

United States v. Seymour-Smith

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 5, 202423-1291California375 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 5 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-1291 D.C. No. 2:18-cr-00064-TOR-1 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

KEENAN TYREL SEYMOUR-SMITH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Thomas O. Rice, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 29, 2024**

Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Keenan Tyrel Seymour-Smith appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 12-month sentence imposed upon the revocation of his supervised

release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Seymour-Smith contends that the district court failed to explain the sentence

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). adequately and did not address his mitigating arguments. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.