Schelton Jones v. People of California
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 5, 202423-55746California270 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 5 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SCHELTON JONES, No. 23-55746
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:23-cv-02769-FLA-JC
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 29, 2024**
Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.
Schelton Jones appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing
his federal action seeking to restore his right to possess a firearm. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Big Sandy Rancheria
Enters. v. Bonta, 1 F.4th 710, 719 (9th Cir. 2021). We may affirm on any basis
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). supported by the record. Thompson v.…