Schelton Jones v. People of California

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 5, 202423-55746California270 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 5 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SCHELTON JONES, No. 23-55746

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:23-cv-02769-FLA-JC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 29, 2024**

Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Schelton Jones appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his federal action seeking to restore his right to possess a firearm. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Big Sandy Rancheria

Enters. v. Bonta, 1 F.4th 710, 719 (9th Cir. 2021). We may affirm on any basis

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). supported by the record. Thompson v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.