Goodwin

United States v. Goodwin

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 5, 202423-1518California458 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 5 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-1518 D.C. No. 4:18-cr-00072-DCN-1 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

JAMES C. GOODWIN III,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho David C. Nye, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 29, 2024**

Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

James C. Goodwin III appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying

several postconviction motions. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and

we affirm.

Goodwin first contends that the district court improperly delegated its

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). authority to the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) to set a payment schedule for his

monetary penalties. The record belies this claim. The judgment sets…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.