Felder

United States v. Felder

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 5, 202423-597California392 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 5 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 23-596 23-597 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. Nos. 3:14-cr-00536-MMC-1 3:19-cr-00256-MMC-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MARCUS DIETER FELDER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Maxine M. Chesney, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 29, 2024**

Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, Marcus Dieter Felder challenges a special

condition of supervised release that was imposed following his convictions for

aggravated identity theft, fraudulent use of unauthorized access devices, effecting

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). transactions with access devices issued to other persons, contempt of court, and

failure…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.