Bowling

United States v. Bowling

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 5, 202423-1589California421 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 5 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-1589 D.C. No. 2:22-cr-00080-TOR-1 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. MEMORANDUM*

DANNIE PAUL BOWLING III,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Thomas O. Rice, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 29, 2024**

Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Dannie Paul Bowling III appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 18-year sentence imposed upon his guilty-plea conviction for

production and attempted production of child pornography, in violation of

U.S.C. § 2251(a), (e).

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Bowling first contends that the district court failed to explain the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.