Universal Dyeing and Printing, Inc. v. Walgreen Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 2, 20192:18-cv-09524California5,957 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

l 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNIVERSAL DYEING & Case No.: 2:18-cv-09524-SVW-KS || PRINTING, INC., Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER IIWALGREEN CO., an Illinois ||corporation; and DOES through 10, Defendants. 17 18 Pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and based on 20 || the parties’ Stipulated Protective Order (“Stipulation”) filed on July 26, 2019, the |/terms of the protective order to which the parties have agreed are adopted as a 22 || protective order of this Court (which generally shall govern the pretrial phase of 23 || this action) except to the extent, as set forth below, that those terms have been ||modified by the Court’s amendment of paragraphs 3, and 12. of the 25 || Stipulation. \\ 27 |} \\

l AGREED TERMS OF THE PROTECTIVE ORDER AS ADOPTED AND MODIFIED BY THE COURT! 3 4 |} 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 6…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.