Lloyd George Kenney v. J. Carp

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 2, 20192:19-cv-05759California4,461 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LLOYD GEORGE KENNEY, Case No. 2:19-cv-05759-AB-KES

Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

v. WITH LE AVE TO AMEND

J. CARP, et al.,

Defendants.

I.

INTRODUCTION

Lloyd George Kenney (“Plaintiff”), a prisoner in the custody of the federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”), filed a pro se civil rights Complaint alleging violations of his constitutional rights by 12 Defendants: 5 work at Federal Correctional Institution (“FCI”) Victorville II in California, 5 work at FCI Phoenix in Arizona, and 2 are BOP Administrators. (Dkt. 1 at 3-6.) Plaintiff sues each Defendant in

1 The “BOP Administrator” defendants are J. Baltazar, the BOP’s Western Regional Director in Stockton, California, and Ken Hyle, the BOP’s General Counsel in Washington, D.C. (Dkt. 1 at 4, 6.) 28 his official and individual capacities. (Id.) For the reasons discussed below,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.