Marisella Macias v. City of Fullerton

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 5, 20198:19-cv-01082California4,878 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1100 SOUTHERN DIVISION

1111 MARISELLA MACIAS, Case No: 8:19-cv-01082-DOC (JDEx) 1122 Plaintiff, 1133 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE vs. ORDER 1144

CITY OF FULLERTON, JOSEPH

1155 ZUNIGA, individually and as a peace officer, DOES 1-10, inclusive 1166 Defendants. 1177

1188 Pursuant to the Stipulation of the parties (Dkt. 16), the Court makes the 1199 following findings and enters the following Order. 2200 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 2211 Discovery in this action involves production of confidential, proprietary, or 2222 private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from 2233 use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. 2244 Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the 2255 following Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket 2266 protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it 2277 11 affords from public disclosure…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.