Evist Herrera v. Pier 1 Imports U.S., Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 5, 20195:19-cv-00999California3,280 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

A. Procedural History

On March 7, 2019, Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendants Pier 1 Imports U.S., Inc. (“Pier 1”), Daisy Zuniga (together, “Defendants”), and Does 1–100 in the San Bernardino Superior Court. (“Complaint,” Dkt. No. 1-1.) The Complaint alleged nine causes of action: 1) disability discrimination in violation of Cal. Govt. Code § 12940(a) based on disparate treatment; 2) disability discrimination in violation of Cal. Govt. Code § 12940(m) based on failure to provide reasonable accommodation; 3) disability discrimination in violation of Cal. Govt. Code 12940(n) based on failure to engage in the interactive process; 4) retaliation in violation of Cal. Govt. Code § 12490(h); 5) failure to do everything reasonably necessary to prevent discrimination and retaliation in violation of Cal. Govt. Code § 12940(k); 6) violation of Cal. Govt. Code § 12945.2(a); 7) retaliation for taking/requesting leave in violation of Cal. Govt. Code § 12945.2(1); 8) wrongful termination in violation of public policy; and 9) intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”). (Id.) Of these, only the IIED claim is brought against Zuniga. (Id. at 21.) On May 31,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.