ITN Flix, LLC v. Gloria Hinojosa

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 6, 20192:14-cv-08797California3,737 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court 9 Central District of California

10 11 ITN FLIX, LLC, et al., Case №: 2:14-CV-08797-ODW (AGRx)

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION FOR RULING ON

DEFENDANTS’ ANTI-SLAPP

14 GLORIA HINOJOSA, et al., MOTION TO STRIKE [116]; AND

Defendants. GRANTING, IN PART,

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

STRIKE [34]

17 I. INTRODUCTION Presently before the Court are Rodriguez Defendants’1 Motion for a Ruling on 20 Anti-SLAPP Motion (“Motion for Ruling”) (ECF No. 116) and Motion to Strike 21 Pursuant to California Anti-SLAPP Statute (“Anti-SLAPP Motion”) (ECF No. 34). 22 For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS the Motion for Ruling and 23 GRANTS, IN PART, the Anti-SLAPP Motion.2 24 1 Plaintiffs ITN Flix, LLC and Gil Medina (“Plaintiffs”) sued two groups of defendants in this 25 action, the “Rodriguez Defendants” and the “Hinojosa Defendants.” (See Compl., ECF No. 1.) “Rodriguez Defendants” include Robert Rodriguez and production companies Machete Kills,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.