ITN Flix, LLC v. Gloria Hinojosa

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 6, 20192:14-cv-08797California6,411 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 ITN FLIX, LLC, et al., Case № 2:14-CV-08797-ODW (AGRx)

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS AND/OR STRIKE [107],

GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

14 GLORIA HINOJOSA, et al., [109], AND DENYING AS MOOT

Defendants. MOTION TO STRIKE [110]

16 I. INTRODUCTION This action is a long-running business dispute involving independent film 19 producer Gil Medina, actor Danny Trejo, director Robert Rodriguez, and talent agent 20 Gloria Hinojosa. Medina and his production company, ITN Flix, LLC, developed the 21 vigilante-action film Vengeance starring Trejo and assert that Rodriguez and Hinojosa 22 interfered with Vengeance’s successful release. For the reasons discussed below, the 23 Court GRANTS Defendants’ motions to dismiss and/or strike (ECF Nos. 107, 109), 24 and DENIES as moot Defendants Hinojosa and Amstel, Eisenstadt, Frazier & 25 Hinojosa Talent Agency’s (“AEFH”) Motion to Strike (ECF No. 110).1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.