Israel Angeles-Moctezuma v. Felipe Martinez

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 6, 20192:19-cv-05848California1,971 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No.: 2:19-cv-05848-VAP-MAA Date: August 6, 2019 Title: Angeles-Moctezuma v. Martinez

Present: The Honorable MARIA A. AUDERO, United States Magistrate Judge

Chris Silva N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

N/A N/A

Proceedings (In Chambers): Order to Show Cause Why the First Amended Petition Should Not Be Recharacterized as a Section 2255 Motion

On July 1, 2019, Petitioner Israel Angeles-Moctezuma, an inmate in federal custody, constructively filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (“Section 2241”). (“Petition,” ECF No. 1.) On July 23, 2019, Petitioner constructively filed a First Amended Petition. (“FAP,” ECF No. 4.) The Court sua sponte examines whether this United States District Court for the Central District of California has jurisdiction to entertain the FAP. For the reasons discussed below, the Court directs Petitioner to explain why the FAP should not be characterized as a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (“Section 2255”) and dismissed for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.