U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v. Myron Hale
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
l JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., ele, CASE NUMBER: 10 ll CV 19-6495-RGK (PLAx) Plaintiff v. 13 || Myron Hale, et al.,
ORDER REMANDING CASE TO
STATE COURT Defendant(s). 16 The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the 18 || County of Los Angeles for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. “The right of removal is entirely a creature of statute and ‘a suit commenced in a state must remain there until cause is shown for its transfer under some act of Congress.” Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. Henson, 537 U.S. 28, 32 (2002) (quoting Great Northern R. Co. |lv. Alexander, 246 U.S. 276, 280 (1918)). Where Congress has acted to create a right of removal, 23 || those statutes are strictly construed against removal jurisdiction. Id.; Nevada v. Bank of America Corp., 672 F.3d 661, 667 (9th Cir.…