Gustavo D. Monroy v. R. Fisher

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No. SA CV 18-02044-VBF-JDE GUSTAVO D. MONROY, ORDER Petitioner, Adopting the R&R: v, Directing Entry of ludemont R. FISHER, Junior (Warden), Terminating the Case 5-6) Respondent. 15 The Magistrate Judge issued an Amended Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on April 23, 2019. See CM/ECF Document (“Doc”) 13. Petitioner has not objected within the time allotted by Local Rule 72-3.4, and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) requires de novo review only of those parts of an R&R to which a party has timely objected. See Khan v. Langford, 2018 WL 1271204, * (C.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2018) (citing, inter alia, US v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc)). But the Advisory Committee Notes to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) recommend that when no timely objection is filed, the Court should review the R&R…