Fred Leeds Asset Group, Inc. v. Tracie M. Ruben

JS-6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

? Fred Leeds Asset GRoup, Inc., CASE NUMBER: 10 CV 19-6807-CAS (KSx) Plaintiff We 13 || Tracie M. Ruben, Lauryn Edwards, and

DOES 1 TO ORDER REMANDING CASE TO

STATE COURT Defendant(s). 16 The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the |iCounty of Los Angeles for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. “The right of removal is entirely a creature of statute and ‘a suit commenced in a state ||court must remain there until cause is shown for its transfer under some act of Congress.” 21 |! Syngenta Crop Prot., Inc. v. Henson, 537 U.S. 28, 32 (2002) (quoting Great N. Ry. Co. v. 22 |! Alexander, 246 U.S. 276, 280 (1918)). Generally, where Congress has acted to create a right of 23 || removal, those statutes are strictly construed against…