Beverly Ann Colvin v. Nancy A. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BEVERY ANN COLVIN, Case No. 5:18-cv-00982-FMO (MAA) 12 Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATION OF

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE of Social Security, JUDGE Defendant. 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, the Parties’ Joint Stipulation (“Joint Stip.”), the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”). Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of the portions of the Report to which Petitioner has raised objections (“Objections”). For the reasons stated below, the Objections are overruled. Plaintiff objects that the Report failed to recognize legal error by the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) on the issue of the examining psychiatrist’s opinion. (Objections at 2-4.) According to Plaintiff, the ALJ committed legal error when he “adopted” the examining psychiatrist’s opinion that Plaintiff…