Juan Mejia v. R. Madden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 12, 20192:16-cv-06895California414 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 10 _________________________________ ) JUAN MEJIA, ) No. LA CV 16-06895-VBF-JC ) Petitioner, ) ORDER ) v. ) Adopting the R&R: ) Denying the Habeas Corpus Petition RAYMOND MADDEN (Warden), ) ) Directing Entry of Final Judgment; Respondent. ) Terminating the Case (JS-6) ________________________________)

17 The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on June 18 17, 2019. See CM/ECF Document (“Doc”) 21. Petitioner has not objected within the 19 time allotted by Local Rule 72-3.4, and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) requires de novo 20 review only of those parts of an R&R to which a party has timely objected. See Khan 21 v. Langford, 2018 WL 1271204, *1 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2018) (citing, inter alia, US 22 v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc)). But…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.