Mark Valladolid v. Alfonso Montano

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 14, 20195:19-cv-01456California861 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

' JS-6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK VALLADOLID, cRemanTETE 10 ll ED CV 19-1456-JGB (SPx) Plaintiff v. ALFONSO MONTANO, et al.,

ORDER REMANDING CASE TO

STATE COURT ae Defendant(s). 16 The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the County of San Bernardino for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. “The right of removal is entirely a creature of statute and ‘a suit commenced in a state 20 || court must remain there until cause is shown for its transfer under some act of Congress.” 21 || Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. Henson, 537 U.S. 28, 32 (2002) (quoting Great Northern R. Co. Alexander, 246 U.S. 276, 280 (1918)). Where Congress has acted to create a right of removal, 23 || those statutes are strictly construed against removal jurisdiction. Id.; Nevada v. Bank of America 24 |! Corp., 672…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.