Valeriano Diviacchi v. State Bar of California

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 6, 202423-16170California693 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 6 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VALERIANO DIVIACCHI, No. 23-16170

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:23-cv-02417-LB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Laurel D. Beeler, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 4, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: MILLER and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT,*** District Judge.

Valeriano Diviacchi appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 action against the State Bar of California for lack of subject matter

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation. jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.