Angeles Jimenez Alaniz v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 6, 202420-71195California852 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 6 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANGELES JIMENEZ ALANIZ; YULASMI No. 20-71195

ESMERALDA LOZANO JIMENEZ;

DAVID LOZANO JIMENEZ, Agency Nos. A208-120-061

A208-120-062

Petitioners, A208-120-063

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 6, 2024** Portland, Oregon

Before: WARDLAW, TALLMAN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Angeles Jimenez Alaniz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing her appeal

of an order of an immigration judge (“IJ”) denying her applications for asylum,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture

(“CAT”).1 We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.