Marie Williams v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 6, 202423-55155California1,414 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 6 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIE WILLIAMS, individually; No. 23-55155 RUSSELL WILLIAMS SR., individually; DANIEL McCLANAHAM, individually; D.C. No. ANTHONY WILLIAMS, individually and 2:22-cv-05798-PA-AS as Personal Representative of the Estate of RUSSELL WILLIAMS Deceased,

MEMORANDUM*

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a Governmental Entity; DOE DEFENDANTS,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 16, 2024 Pasadena, California

Before: COLLINS, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Appellants Marie Williams, Russell Williams Sr., Anthony Williams, and

Daniel McClanaham filed this action on behalf of their now-deceased family

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. member, Russell Williams Jr. They appeal the dismissal of their claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.