Spearson

United States v. Spearson

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 6, 202423-3553California268 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 6 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-3553 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 9:23-cr-00030-DWM-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

ROBERT DEAN SPEARSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 29, 2024**

Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Robert Dean Spearson appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 132-month sentence for possession with

intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Spearson’s counsel has

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.