Casares-Cuevas

United States v. Casares-Cuevas

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 6, 202423-3673California356 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 6 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-3673 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:12-cr-00038-LRH-VPC-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

ANTONIO CASARES-CUEVAS, AKA

Roberto Mendoza, AKA Fernando, AKA Tony,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 29, 2024**

Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Antonio Casares-Cuevas appeals pro se from the district court’s order

denying his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i).

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Casares-Cuevas argues that, contrary to the district court’s conclusion, he

exhausted his administrative…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.