U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v. Myron Hale
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 14, 20192:19-cv-06955California889 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
1 JS-6 . . 5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 U.S. BANK TRUST N.A., etc., CASE NUMBER: 10 CV 19-6955-CAS (PLAx) Plaintiff v. 13 || MYRON HALE, et al.,
ORDER REMANDING CASE TO
STATE COURT Defendant(s). 16 The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the 18 || County of Los Angeles for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. “The right of removal is entirely a creature of statute and ‘a suit commenced in a state 20 || court must remain there until cause is shown for its transfer under some act of Congress.” 21 || Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. Henson, 537 U.S. 28, 32 (2002) (quoting Great Northern R. Co. Alexander, 246 U.S. 276, 280 (1918)). Where Congress has acted to create a right of removal, 23 those…