Antonio M. Taylor v. USP Warden Milunsic

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 16, 20192:19-cv-07060California785 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. 2:19-cv-07060-MWF (SK) Date August 16, 2019 Title Antonio M. Taylor v. USP Warden Milunsic

Present: The Honorable Steve Kim, United States Magistrate Judge Connie Chung n/a Deputy Clerk Court Smart / Recorder Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Respondent: None present None present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Petitioner, a federal prisoner within the Central District of California, filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging his 2014 sentence from the Western District of Missouri for drug and firearm convictions. (Pet., ECF 1 at 2). He claims that his sentence was improperly enhanced under the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”) and the trial court impermissibly delegated its obligation to set a restitution payment schedule under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996 (“MVRA”). (Id. at 11-14). But this is Petitioner’s second attempt to challenge that sentence through a habeas petition. Petitioner already filed an unsuccessful motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 in the Western District of Missouri. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.