McCullough
Francois Tabi v. McCullough
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 FRANCOIS TABI, Case No. CV 17-1795 DMG(JC) 11 Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND v. ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE OFFICER MCCULLOUGH, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 I. BACKGROUND On March 6, 2017, Plaintiff paid the filing fee and filed a complaint against multiple employees of the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (“LADOT”) in their individual capacities: Officer McCullough, Officer Enriquez, J. Atkinson, T. Mayer, Kenneth Heinsuis, and four unnamed defendants (collectively “defendants”). [Doc. # 1.] On March 7, 2017, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued an Order Regarding Service of Process (“March Order”) advising Plaintiff that pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, service of the summons and complaint must be accomplished on each defendant within 90 days after filing the complaint, i.e., by June 5, 2017. [Doc. # 5.] The March Order directed Plaintiff to file separate proof of service forms for each…