Skyline Owners Association v. Pauline Clay

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 23, 20192:19-cv-05446California716 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. CV 19-5446-GW-JPRx Date August 23, 2019

Title Skyline Owners Association v. Pauline Clay, et al. Page 1 of

Present: The Honorable GEORGE H. WU, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Javier Gonzalez None Present Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys Present for Defendant(s)

None Present None Present

Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS – ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT

On November 13, 2017, Plaintiff Skyline Owners Association file an action in state court to set aside an alleged fraudulent transfer of real property (i.e. Unit 511 at 600 West 9th Street, Los Angeles, CA 90015) by Defendant Pauline Clay. See Complaint in Skyline Owners Ass’n. v. Clay, Case No. BC683230, Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Docket No. 8-1 at 28-34 of 49. On June 21, 2019, Defendant removed that action to federal court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1442 & 1443 on the sole basis she is a “federal officer within the provision of section 1442” because she was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.