Luis Licea v. Reebok International Ltd

nited States District Court Central District of California Western Division ED 1211 LUIS LICEA, CV 19-00970 TJH (Ex) Plaintiff, v. Orser REEBOK INTERNATIONAL LTD, Defendants. JS-6 17 18 The Court has considered Plaintiff Luis Licea’s motion to remand and request 20 || for attorneys’ fees, together with the moving and opposing papers. Defendant Reebok International Ltd [“Reebok”] removed this case based on 22 || federal question jurisdiction, asserting that the alleged California Unruh Civil Rights 23 || Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 51(f) [“Unruh Act”], violation was premised on Reebok’s 24 || alleged Americans with Disabilities Act, U.S.C. §§ 12101, et seg. [SADA”], 25 || violations. Generally, a state law claim gives rise to a federal question only when a federal 27 || law is a necessary element of the state claim. Wander v. Kaus, 304 F.3d 856,…