Derrick James Butler v. Raymond Madden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20195:19-cv-01449California532 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. 5:19-cv-1449-JGB Date: August 26, 2019 Title: Derrick James Butler v. United States

Present: The Honorable Shashi H. Kewalramani, United States Magistrate Judge

D. Castellanos Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present

Proceedings (IN CHAMBERS): Order to Show Cause Why Petition Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Name Proper Respondent On August 5, 2019, Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has failed to name a proper respondent on page 1 of the petition.

A habeas petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 by a petitioner who is currently in custody under a state court judgment must name as respondent the state officer who has custody of the petitioner. Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 434-35 (2004); 28 U.S.C. § 2242; Rule 2(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.