Holly Louis v. Pauline Shepherd

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 27, 20192:19-cv-07224California1,147 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

peek ee or court 2 8/27/2019 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BY: CW DEPUTY

4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

. Holly Louis, CASE NUMBER: 10 2:19-cv-7224-FMO (JPR) Plaintiff Vv. 13 || Pauline Shepherd,

ORDER REMANDING CASE TO

STATE COURT Defendant(s). 16 The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the 18 || County of Los Angeles for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. “The right of removal is entirely a creature of statute and ‘a suit commenced in a state 20 court must remain there until cause is shown for its transfer under some act of Congress.” Syngenta Crop Prot., Inc. v. Henson, 537 U.S. 28, 32 (2002) (quoting Great N. Ry. Co. v. 22 |] Alexander, 246 U.S. 276, 280 (1918)). Generally, where…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.