Holly Louis v. Pauline Shepherd
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 27, 20192:19-cv-07224California1,147 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
peek ee or court 2 8/27/2019 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BY: CW DEPUTY
4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
. Holly Louis, CASE NUMBER: 10 2:19-cv-7224-FMO (JPR) Plaintiff Vv. 13 || Pauline Shepherd,
ORDER REMANDING CASE TO
STATE COURT Defendant(s). 16 The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the 18 || County of Los Angeles for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. “The right of removal is entirely a creature of statute and ‘a suit commenced in a state 20 court must remain there until cause is shown for its transfer under some act of Congress.” Syngenta Crop Prot., Inc. v. Henson, 537 U.S. 28, 32 (2002) (quoting Great N. Ry. Co. v. 22 |] Alexander, 246 U.S. 276, 280 (1918)). Generally, where…