Salvador Magana v. Santa Paula Materials, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 29, 20192:19-cv-00713California1,643 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-

2 || CC: LASC- COUNTY OF VENTURA 3 4 5 6 7 g Anited States District Court Central District of California 10 SALVADOR MAGANA and LAURA Case Ne: 2:19-cv-00713-ODW (SSx) MAGANA, Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO v. REMAND [27] SANDVIK MINING AND CONSTRUCTION USA, LLC; 16 UNITED SCREENING AND CRUSHING, INC.; EXTEC, INC.; and 17! DOES 5 through 100, inclusive, Defendants. 19 I INTRODUCTION On May 11, 2017, Plaintiffs Salvador Magana and Laura Magana (“Plaintiffs”) filed this personal injury action in the Superior Court of California for the County of Ventura. (Notice of Removal Ex. A (“Compl.”), ECF No. 1-1.) Prior to the current defendants appearing, Defendant Sandvik, Inc.,! (“Sandvik”) removed this matter based on federal diversity jurisdiction. (See Notice of Removal {J 9, 13, 17, ECF No. 1.) Plaintiffs move to remand. (Mot. to Remand (“Mot.”), ECF No. 27.) For the 27 A ' Not to be confused with Defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.