Danielle Denise Hemphill v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20195:18-cv-01438California2,098 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIELLE H., Case No. 5:18-cv-01438-GJS

Plaintiff

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND

v. ORDER

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff filed a complaint seeking review of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner”) denial of her applications for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”)2 and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). The parties filed consents to proceed before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge [Dkts. 11, 12] and briefs addressing disputed issue in the case [Dkt. 19 (“Pltf.’s Br.”), Dkt. 22 (“Def.’s Br.”)]. The Court has taken the parties’ briefing 24 In the interest of privacy, this Order uses only the first name and the initial of 25 the last name of the non-governmental party in this case. 26 Plaintiff’s Title II claim is for “Medicare Hospital Insurance Benefits for a Medicare Qualified Government Employee.” AR…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.