Danielle Denise Hemphill v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DANIELLE H., Case No. 5:18-cv-01438-GJS
Plaintiff
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND
v. ORDER
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff filed a complaint seeking review of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner”) denial of her applications for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”)2 and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). The parties filed consents to proceed before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge [Dkts. 11, 12] and briefs addressing disputed issue in the case [Dkt. 19 (“Pltf.’s Br.”), Dkt. 22 (“Def.’s Br.”)]. The Court has taken the parties’ briefing 24 In the interest of privacy, this Order uses only the first name and the initial of 25 the last name of the non-governmental party in this case. 26 Plaintiff’s Title II claim is for “Medicare Hospital Insurance Benefits for a Medicare Qualified Government Employee.” AR…