Hermelinda Luna v. Johnson and Johnson

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20192:18-cv-04830California1,685 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION

10 11 HERMELINDA LUNA, Case No. 2:18-cv-04830-GW-KS ALEXANDRIA HANKS ON BEHALF

OF THE ESTATE OF TANIA D. [PROPOSED] AMENDED

HANKS, ETHEL HERRERA, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

JEANETTE JONES, BECKY ORDER

CANZONERI, MARGARET REED and BRENDA VERSIC, Ctrm.: 9D Judge: Hon. George H. Wu Plaintiffs, 16 v. Trial Date: None JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON Date Action Filed: March 6, 2018 & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., AND DOES 1-25, inclusive, 19 Defendants.

22 Pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and based on the parties’ Proposed Amended Stipulated Protective Order (“Stipulation”) filed on August 29, 2019, the terms of the protective order to which the parties have agreed are adopted as a protective order of this Court (which generally shall govern the pretrial phase of this action) except to the extent, as set forth below, that those terms have been modified by the Court’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.