Vizio, Inc. v. Navigators Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 29, 20212:20-cv-06864California3,405 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 VIZIO, INC., Case № 2:20-CV-06864-ODW (ASx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING

v.

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

14 ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, DISMISS [63]

15 Defendant.

16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Vizio, Inc. initiated this action against Arch Insurance Company and 19 Navigators Insurance Company (together, “Defendants”) based on its claim that 20 Defendants failed to provide benefits pursuant to the terms of their primary and excess 21 insurance policies. (See generally First Am. Compl. (“FAC”), ECF No. 27.) On 22 July 15, 2021, Vizio filed the operative third amended complaint. (Third Am. Compl. 23 (“TAC”), ECF No. 62.) Arch now moves to dismiss the TAC under Federal Rule of 24 Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6). (Mot. to Dismiss (“Motion” or “Mot.”), ECF 25 No. 63.) For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Arch’s Motion.1 26

28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the matter appropriate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.