Trajkovski Invest AB v. I.Am.Plus Electronics, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 29, 20212:21-cv-04246California2,436 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

23 This matter comes before the Court upon the Motion to Enforce Foreign 24 Arbitral Award, ((“Mot.” or “Motion”), ECF No. 20), filed by Petitioners 25 Trajkovski Invest AB, OPK Holding AB, Lindén Invent AB, Capmate 26 Aktiebolag, Christian Ask, Christian Månsson, Granitor Invest AB, Jimmie 27 Landerman, Johan Kjell, Jussi Ax, LMK Forward AB, Lusam Invest AB, 28 Martin Bengtsson, Midroc Finans AB, Muirfield Ventures AB, Råsunda 1 Förvaltning Aktiebolag, and Expassum Holding AB (collectively, 2 “Petitioners”). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Petitioners’ 3 Motion. II. BACKGROUND The Court adopts in full the extensive statement of facts set forth in the 6 Award by the SCC Tribunal. (Decl. of Malcolm S. McNeil (“McNeil Decl.”), 7 Ex. A, Pet. Confirmation Foreign Arbitration Award (“Pet.”) 90–104, ECF 8 No. 20-1.) Petitioners are a group of seventeen Swedish technology start-up 9 entrepreneurs and investors comprised of individuals residing in Sweden, and 10 corporations incorporated under Swedish law with their principal places of 11 business in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.