Nancy Davis v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20225:21-cv-01767California1,127 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. Background

A. Facts The following facts are drawn from Plaintiff Nancy Davis’s (“Plaintiff”) Complaint (“Compl.”) (Dkt. 1-1). Plaintiff alleges that she slipped on an unknown substance and suffered injuries while purchasing groceries at Defendant’s store. See Compl. at 4. Plaintiff attributes her injuries to Defendant’s negligence. See id.

B. Procedural History Plaintiff originally filed suit in the Riverside Superior Court on January 13, 2021. See generally Compl. On October 19, Defendant removed the action to this Court, asserting diversity jurisdiction. Notice of Removal (Dkt. 1).

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. ED CV 21-01767-DOC-SP Date: January 3, 2022 Page

II. Legal Standard

“If at any time before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the case shall be remanded.” 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). Removal of a case from state court to federal court is governed by 28 U.S.C. § 1441, which provides in relevant part that “any civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction, may be removed . . . to the district court of the United…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.