Dong Su v. Henry Global Consulting Group
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
O
2 3 4 5 6
United States District Court Central District of California
11 DONG SU, et al., Case № 2:20-cv-02235-ODW (PLAx)
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING
v.
MOTION TO DISMISS [28]
14 HENRY GLOBAL CONSULTING GROUP, et al., 15 Defendants.
16 I. INTRODUCTION On July 22, 2021, Plaintiffs initiated this putative class action against 19 Defendants Henry Global Consulting Group (Global); Goldstone Advisors, Ltd.; and 20 Henry Tongzhao USA Consulting, Inc., erroneously sued as Tongzhao USA 21 Consulting, Inc. (“Tongzhao”). (Second Am. Compl. (“SAC”), ECF No. 25.) 22 Plaintiffs assert two causes of action: breach of fiduciary duty and fraud. (See 23 generally SAC.) Tongzhao now moves to dismiss for failure to state a claim. (Mot. 24 Dismiss (“Motion” or “Mot.”), ECF No. 28.) The parties have fully briefed the 25 matter. (Opp’n, ECF No. 30; Reply, ECF No. 31.) For the reasons discussed below, 26 the Court GRANTS Tongzhao’s Motion.1
28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection…