Agustin Martinez v. City of Ontario

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20225:21-cv-01099California3,625 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

11 James R. Touchstone, SBN 184584 jrt@jones-mayer.com 22 Denise L. Rocawich, SBN 232792 dlr@jones-mayer.com 33 JONES & MAYER 3777 North Harbor Boulevard 44 Fullerton, CA 92835 Telephone: (714) 446-1400 55 Facsimile: (714) 446-1448

66 Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF ONTARIO

77 Dale K. Galipo, SBN 144074 dalekgalipo@yahoo.com 88 Eric Valenzuela, SBN 284500) evalenzuela@galipolaw.com 99 LAW OFFICES OF DALE K. GALIPO 21800 Burbank Boulevard, Suite 310 1100 Woodland Hills, California 91367 Telephone: (818) 347-3333 1111 Facsimile: (818) 347-4118

1122 Attorneys for Plaintiff AGUSTIN MARTINEZ

1133

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1144

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1155 AGUSTIN MARTINEZ, an Case No.: CV21-01099 JGB (SP) 1166 individual; Judge: Hon. Jesus G. Bernal 1177

Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE 1188 vs. ORDER 1199

CITY OF ONTARIO; and DOES 1 2200 through 10 inclusive, 2211 Defendants. 2222

2233

2244

2255

2266

2277 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), Defendant CITY OF 33 ONTARIO and Plaintiff AGUSTIN MARTINEZ (collectively…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.