Salvador Espinoza v. Jeff Lynch

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20222:21-cv-00686California215 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SALVADOR ESPINOZA, Case No. 2:21-cv-00686-GW-PD

Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT

AND ADOPTING, FINDINGS,

v.

CONCLUSIONS, AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF JEFF LYNCH, Warden,

UNITED STATES

15 Respondent. MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF

APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”). The Court accepts the Report as its own findings and conclusions. Further, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right or that the court erred in its procedural ruling and, therefore, a certificate of appealability will not issue in this action. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. 27 28 ! || Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 2…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.