Rosemarie Mesa v. Victor Luis Mesa

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20222:21-cv-03550California1,116 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O 2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California

11 ROSEMARIE MESA, Case № 2:21-cv-03550-ODW (MARx)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT v. VICTOR LUIS MESA’S MOTION TO

DISMISS [36]

14 VICTOR LUIS MESA, et al., 15 Defendants. 17 18 19 I. INTRODUCTION Defendant Victor Luis Mesa (“Defendant”) moves to dismiss the claims asserted 22 against him in Plaintiff Rosemarie Mesa’s First Amended Complaint. (See generally 23 Mot. Dismiss, ECF No. 36; First Am. Compl. (“FAC”), ECF No. 16.) As explained 24 below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion.1 25 26

28 1 After carefully considering the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. II. BACKGROUND Plaintiff pleads few facts regarding her claims against Defendant. Plaintiff 3 alleges that on or about September 19, 2004, decedent Joseph Mesa,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.