Will Arthur Gregory v. Rick Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20222:21-cv-09935California1,351 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:21-cv-9935-DMG (MAR) Date: January 6, 2022 Title: Will Arthur Gregory v. Rick Hill Present: The Honorable: MARGO A. ROCCONI, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ERICA BUSTOS N/A

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

N/A N/A

Proceedings: (In Chambers) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: WHY PETITION SHOULD

NOT BE SUMMARILY DISMISSED AS UNTIMELY

Petitioner Will Arthur Gregory (“Petitioner”), proceeding pro se, constructively filed1 a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (“Petition”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“section 2254”), ECF Docket No. (“Dkt.”) 1, and an Addendum to the Petition challenging his April 10, 1998 conviction. Dkt. 2 at 3. On August 19, 1998, Petitioner filed a Notice of Appeal in Division Two of the Court of Appeal of the State of California. On April 3, 2000, the Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s decision but remanded the case for resentencing. Dkt. 1, Exhibit A at 26–35. On March 12, 2021, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.