Warden

Douglas Lasance v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20222:21-cv-06501California1,980 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:21-cv-06501-MCS-MAR Document Filed 01/07/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

1

4 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 DOUGLAS LASANCE, Case No. 2:21-cv-6501-MCS (MAR) Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DISMISSING CASE

v. WARDEN, ET AL., Defendant. 15 16 I. INTRODUCTION On August 3, 2021, Douglas Lasance (“Plaintiff”) constructively filed1 a pro se Civil Rights Complaint (“Complaint”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“section 1983”). ECF Docket No. (“Dkt.”) 1. On September 3, 2021, the Court dismissed the Complaint with leave to amend (“ODLA”), granting Plaintiff until October 4, 2021 to file a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). Dkt. 8 at 9. To date, Plaintiff has not filed a FAC. For the reasons below, the Court DISMISSES this action, without prejudice.

26 1 Under the “mailbox rule”, when a pro se prisoner gives prison authorities a pleading to mail to the court, the court deems the pleading constructively “filed” on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.