Unknown

Manuel Ollarsaba v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20225:21-cv-01896California2,595 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 5:21-cv-01896-SVW-MAR Document Filed 01/07/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

1 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6 7 MANUEL OLLARSABA, Case No. 5:21-cv-1896-SVW (MAR) 8 Plaintiff, ORDER SUMMARILY DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT v.

UNKNOWN,

11 Defendant. 12 I. INTRODUCTION On November 3, 2021, Manuel Ollarsaba (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, constructively filed1 a Complaint (“Complaint”). ECF Docket No. (“Dkt.”) 1. On November 16, 2021, the Court dismissed the Complaint with leave to amend. Dkt. 4. On December 10, 2021, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). Dkt. 6. For the reasons discussed below, the Court dismisses the FAC without leave to amend and without prejudice. /// /// /// ///

26 1 Under the “mailbox rule,” when a pro se inmate gives prison authorities a pleading to mail to court, the court deems the pleading constructively “filed” on the date it is signed. Roberts v. Marshall, 627 F.3d 768, 770 n.1 (9th Cir. 2010) (citation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.