James Anthony Humphrey v. City of Santa Monica

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20222:21-cv-06812California5,039 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:21-cv-06812-JLS-GJS Document Filed 01/10/ Page 1 of Page ID #:132

7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES ANTHONY HUMPHREY Case No. 2:21-cv-06812-JLS-GJS

12 Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER1 v. 14 CITY OF SANTA MONICA; Honorable Josephine L. Staton JORDAN VARAK; ANDREW SANCHEZ; and DOES 1 through 10, Honorable Gail J. Standish inclusive,

17 Defendants. 18 19 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 27 28 1 This Stipulated Protective Order is substantially based on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.