Harold Yong Park v. Raymond Madden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20222:19-cv-04513California2,404 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:19-cv-04513-SB-PVC Document Filed 01/07/ Page 1 of Page ID #:4398

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HAROLD YONG PARK, Case No. CV 19-4513 SB (PVC)

Petitioner,

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,

v. CONCLUSIONS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Respondent. 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, all the records and files herein, the Amended Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and Petitioner’s Objections. After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Amended Report and Recommendation to which Objections were directed, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. 23 Petitioner’s Objections largely reassert prior arguments that were addressed and rejected in the Amended Report and Recommendation. However, two contentions warrant brief attention. First,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.