Jessica Jessa Hinton v. Vivid Entertainment Group

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20222:21-cv-09402California506 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:21-cv-09402-MWF-PLA Document Filed 01/10/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. CV 21-9402-MWF (PLAx) Date: January 10, 2022 Title Jessica Jessa Hinton, et al. v. Vivid Ent. Grp., et al.

Present: The Honorable: MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, United States District Judge Rita Sanchez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On January 6, 2022, Defendant TMBJ Investments, Inc., d/b/a Vivid Gentlemen’s Club, d/b/a Vivid Live Houston (“TMBJ”), submitted its Answer through the Electronic Document Submission System (“EDSS”). (See Docket No. 12). EDSS is only for use by pro se litigants – however, TMBJ is a corporate entity.

Individual litigants may represent themselves pro se, but corporations and associations must be represented by counsel. See Church of the New Testament v. United States, 783 F.2d 771, 773 (9th Cir. 1986) (unincorporated association); In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.