Hadi Melhem v. FCA US LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 11, 20225:21-cv-01745California2,054 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 5:21-cv-01745-MCS-SP Document Filed 01/11/ Page 1 of Page ID #:776

1 2 3 JS-6 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HADI MELHEM, Case No. 5:21-cv-01745-MCS-SP 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

REMAND (ECF NO. 12)

v.

14 FCA US LLC, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff Hadi Melhem moves to remand this case to the County of Riverside Superior Court. Mot., ECF No. 12-2. Defendant FCA US LLC opposes the motion, Opp’n, ECF No. 18, and Plaintiff filed a reply brief. Reply, ECF No. 22. The Court deems the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. Cal. R. 7-15. I. BACKGROUND This is a case brought under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (“SBA”). Plaintiff bought a 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee in January 2014. This vehicle exhibited defects. Defendant was unable to timely rectify the defects and refused to repurchase the vehicle or provide restitution. The Complaint seeks actual damages, restitution,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.