Michael Karmon v. California Institute of Technology

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20222:21-cv-08910California3,798 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

Before the Court is a motion to remand brought by Plaintiffs Michael Karmon, Galid Rubin, and Adina Kraus (“Plaintiffs”). See Dkt. 17. The wrongful death asbestos exposure case was removed from the Los Angeles Superior Court by Defendants California Institute of Technology, Fisher Scientific Company LLC, and Metalclad Insulation LLC (“Defendants”). See Dkt. 1. Defendant Fisher Scientific also brings a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Dkt. 7. The question before the Court is whether Plaintiffs’ waiver of claims arising out of asbestos exposure at a federal enclave—the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”)—deprives the Court of federal question jurisdiction.! For the reasons stated below, the Court finds that it does. Plaintiffs’ motion to remand is GRANTED. Il. FACTUAL BACKGROUND Plaintiffs are successors-in-interest of Mrs. Judith Karmon, whose various exposures to asbestos are the basis of this wrongful death case. See Compl., Ex. A to Not. Removal, Dkt. 1-1. Mrs. Karmon passed away from mesothelioma on March 2, 2021. See Mot. at 5.

! Defendant California Institute of Technology initially pursued removal on the basis of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.